Re: Mailing list expiry dates

--===============0329081687==
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
	protocol="application/pgp-signature";
	boundary="=-Ep6w5uaY3yP/ZUGGxjE2"


--=-Ep6w5uaY3yP/ZUGGxjE2
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Sun, 2005-10-16 at 01:08, Fred L. Drake, Jr. wrote:
> On Saturday 15 October 2005 07:27, M.-A. Lemburg wrote:
>  > it seems that all SIGs have expired ;-)
>=20
> Heh.  Frankly, I think the "expiration" stuff is pretty silly.  Can we si=
mply=20
> get rid of it?

I still like the idea of culling sigs that are no longer necessary, or
that haven't made any progress in a while.  OTOH, I'm not sure any of
the existing sigs are worthy of retirement.

My suggestion would be to tag all the existing active sigs to expire
December 2006, but if the consensus is to just ditch the expiration
dates, I suppose we can tag them all as "Never" and just deal with
useless sigs on a case-by-case basis.

-Barry


--=-Ep6w5uaY3yP/ZUGGxjE2
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc
Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)

iQCVAwUAQ1LDYHEjvBPtnXfVAQIkFwQAojgH14zqZ7jHzJlSZBqMcxmswuXyoCeg
iwB3mlunY9mx31DJEiOF7dCIFFugx96wcu5QB+f3hPG8S4yivEAHu/knNG06m7zY
Z+jpvRzfcQAz7iFoMAnBA4XM8Dsz5mn3IJd1+THq5HWGSxNpYmOrrFqOSzUnUwP3
GZxOH0mUnnM=
=x3rp
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--=-Ep6w5uaY3yP/ZUGGxjE2--


--===============0329081687==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

_______________________________________________
Meta-sig maillist  -  [email protected]
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/meta-sig

--===============0329081687==--