Re: persistence SIG

Steve Menard <[email protected]> Wed, 03 Jul 2002 09:30:54 -0400

Newsgroups	gmane.comp.python.meta
Message-ID	<[email protected]>

At 01:30 PM 7/3/2002 +0200, holger krekel wrote:
>[Nicolas Chauvat Wed, Jul 03, 2002 at 12:35:42PM +0200]
> > I vote +1 for the persistence SIG and will be very happy to see the
> > following people and projects cooperate :
> >
> >       ZODB from Zope
> >       CAPS from AB Strakt
> >       ?? from inQual
> >       ?? from Roeland Rengelink
> >       POD from pypod.sf.net
> >       others I probably forgot...
>
>
>I'd really like participants not to focus too much
>into bringing one particular implementation into
>the standard lib.  It should be something like a common
>subset of required functionalities.
>
>Other than that i am definitely
>
>+1
>
>     holger

I am not exactly sure what the persistence-SIG is, or exactly what this 
vote entails. I would definitely love to cooperate though.

         Steve



_______________________________________________
Meta-sig maillist  -  [email protected]
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/meta-sig