RE: persistence SIG

Steve Menard <[email protected]> Thu, 04 Jul 2002 09:27:28 -0400

Newsgroups	gmane.comp.python.meta
Message-ID	<[email protected]>

At 02:21 AM 7/4/2002 -0400, Tim Peters wrote:
>[Steve Menard]
> > I am not exactly sure what the persistence-SIG is, or exactly what this
> > vote entails. I would definitely love to cooperate though.
>
>That's fine:  we never know *exactly* what a SIG will do before it starts
>up.  The point of asking is to see whether there's enough interest to *get*
>it started.  The response to this has been unusually high.
>
>If it follows the pattern of other high-profile SIGs, it will have a
>vigorous life until someone actually produces code.  Then everyone will run
>away frightened <0.9 wink>.
>
>the-types-sig-went-thru-that-at-least-twice-ly y'rs  - tim

LOL. Well, it certainly has MY support. And I don't believe people run away 
frightened, I think they're just too happy to have working code and are a 
busy hiding somewhere using it :)

         Steve



_______________________________________________
Meta-sig maillist  -  [email protected]
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/meta-sig