Re: Kick starting email 6.0 development
Barry Warsaw <[email protected]> Fri, 22 Jan 2010 11:45:59 -0500
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.python.mime.devel |
|---|---|
| Organization | Damn Crazy Followers of the Horn |
| Message-ID | <20100122114559.4bb73054@freewill> |
On Jan 22, 2010, at 11:36 AM, R. David Murray wrote:
>I will take a look at that, since I'm actively working on Header
>right now. As for doctests...I agree that they are good for helping to
>document the API, but IMO we are going to need more than that to get a
>really good set of validation tests. I have some thoughts about that
>that I'm experimenting with and will report back when I'm satisfied that
>my idea is at least workable. (Whether it's a *good* idea remains to
>be seen :)
I definitely agree we can't use doctests exclusively. Nobody in their right
mind would ever want to read those things! A good mix of (separate file)
doctest and unittests would probably work, but I'm eager to hear how your
experiment turns out. :)
>My goal in using the DVCS is to make it easy for anyone to submit patches
>for review, which I believe launchpad facilitates. ("Propose for merge",
>right?)
Yep. It's a great way to go. I also suggest that as things stabilize we move
to a model where branches proposed for merging are always linked to a bug.
But that might not always be feasible while there's lots of churn.
>I don't want the branch locked too tightly, I'd rather facilitate active
>contribution. So possibly making an email6 team is better, but since I don't
>know what the consequences of adding someone to ~python-dev are, I don't know
>what would make it a bad thing for someone to be added to it :).
I'm thinking it does make sense to make an email6 team and keep this branch in
a separate package. I've just created the team:
https://edge.launchpad.net/~email6
and made you a co-admin. I think it's up to you to make the team the owner of
the python-email project.
>Well if you are we could try to hijack the whole core sprint to work on
>email :)
That's like the logical extension of Zawinksi's law. :)
>Seriously, though, if I can be of assistance, let me know.
Thanks!
-Barry
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 835 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJLWdZHAAoJEBJutWOnSwa/iI0P/2C4UmFpLI5sRs+p8BHOMwcM JwXmvvLrEga31H2y+B3Ian3zv/zn1YweEnAkv6vebmYEUwCScprSbo8Xru1hKA0o Iuyv1cgiymzcdgAbA5/0/gGq/nHyIJVNrFMK0zQJOWFWo3aAMD5NFCGudFQojYtU FLCfWetqa0Tgb0IoGphrmrkHsdUN1WCV1FYH56WJT++p6+JIVQg+QaFO2Fv8Bh0Q dv2eM9tq+pc6NoXfT+prNKsF08NhZKh5pzW4SvqgvK+YC1MyZfan63AQ7wbhXPqy pn99a72KDvuuE6EDwk6om5N7eQ4hvmubSQ8GY7i+6xW6Knge+nLyy/AyLlYeoHck wzo0nBbaUATgr2kB/N+QgijMKlTIBfTIrOQoDFBS72Jd5Za0PUhy29bsoKVSX6V+ 4Fqn52bLtC3M3hivaMiWvIk1VpXZvXM8Y66bSSNTSoJj/+9ImutnqIylRGHc5JRs Ebz0b7D6ph+jO7w0EGG0SNK303eztmSYD2XHTMsUaMO4CrH9/5UL8Vzlxe0GcHCe 9HsnwG/pTF9ZTKMI90zP2xyrjFHGu2cRO0RkkFylwrZx03+eniKQWLM+FJjOIUT4 uQoSM1pX+4zrg6pa0NZ1w9CRT8n3GvxFY9U2QeRengv1VrP4CK0QnycvsW/f9hnx T13WLwoKr3Zzyqhw/cyc =DjPb -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----