RE: mod_python for heavy use
"Alec Matusis" <matusis-/[email protected]> Mon, 8 Jun 2009 14:52:54 -0700
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.python.mod_python |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <001401c9e883$7a2191f0$6e64b5d0$@com> |
It depends on what your application does. CPU is usually not the bottleneck, unless say you resize massive images all the time. Look at #vmstat 1 when you run your application, paying attention to si (swap in), so (swap out) and especially to bi (bytes in FROM your I/O device) and bo (bytes out). If you serve a lot of files, "bi" should ideally be almost always 0, which means that you need to have sufficient RAM to cache ALL these files, so that it rarely touches the disks. This is applicable to any web app actually, even just plain apache serving static files, not just to mod_python. > -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] [mailto:mod_python- > [email protected]] On Behalf Of Beavis > Sent: Saturday, June 06, 2009 10:59 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: [mod_python] mod_python for heavy use > > hi folks, > > I just want to ask out if there are any folks here that use > mod_python heavily. what sort of hardware requirement do you guys > have? any specific amount of memory, CPU, etc. that would be > beneficial to mod_python? > > any help would be awesomely appreciated. > > regards, > b > > -- > () ascii ribbon campaign - against html e-mail > /\ www.asciiribbon.org - against proprietary attachments > _______________________________________________ > Mod_python mailing list > [email protected] > http://mailman.modpython.org/mailman/listinfo/mod_python