Re: Re: Windows Binaries for Python 2.6
Ambrose Andrews <[email protected]> Mon, 27 Jul 2009 14:12:05 +1000
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.python.mod_python |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
2009/7/27 David <[email protected]>: > On 7/21/2009 7:21 AM, Graham Dumpleton wrote: >> 2009/7/21 <[email protected]>: >>> I am planning an installation of Trac, SVN, and Apache. The current version >>> of Python supported by all is 2.6. But I don't see an installation package >>> for mod_python for python 2.6. Did I miss it? What are my alternatives and >>> what are the risks? >> I have recently set up Trac, Django and SVN using mod_wsgi with no drama at all - and in the case of Django (and mod_gnutls) less drama than I had with mod_python. Unfortunately the documentation for many of the applications continues to refer to mod_python prominently and/or as a default option. This will create problems down the road as python3 starts to spread and mod_python adopters are all left behind at once. I wouldn't have known about mod_wsgi otherwise, so I'm glad Graham still hangs about here. -AA. -- Ambrose Andrews LPO box 8274 ANU Acton ACT 0200 Australia http://www.vrvl.net/~ambrose/ mailto:[email protected] home:+61_262305976 work:+61_261256749 mobile:+61_415544621 irc:{undernet|freenode|oftc}:znalo xmpp:[email protected] sip:[email protected] CE38 8B79 C0A7 DF4A 4F54 E352 2647 19A1 DB3B F823 556A 6D19 0904 827C 9DB8 3697 32D0 1E11 403F 2BE1