Re: state checking
Duncan McGreggor <[email protected]> Wed, 7 Jul 2004 00:39:48 -0400
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.python.modeling |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Sebastien,
Thanks again; this works perfectly -- just what we needed. In case
anyone else has similar needs, here's how we are using it:
class EditorContext(EditingContext):
'''
This class is a wrapper for EditingContext, whose sole purpose is to
set the optimistic locking behind the scenes and provide a simple
interface to users of this code.
'''
def __init__(self):
EditingContext.__init__(self)
self.snapshot_sum = ''
self.protect_data = 0
def fetchData(self, entityName, qualifier=None, isDeep=0,
rawRows=0):
fs=FetchSpecification(entityName, qualifier=None,
sortOrderings=(), distinctFlag=0, deepFlag=0, hints={})
dbContext=self.rootObjectStore().objectStoreForFetchSpecification(fs)
dbContext.setUpdateStrategy(UPDATE_WITH_OPTIMISTIC_LOCKING)
return self.fetch(entityName, qualifier=None, isDeep=0,
rawRows=0)
def commitChanges(self):
try:
self.saveChanges()
except Modeling.Adaptor.OptimisticLockingFailure, e:
raise DatabaseObjectStateError, e
On Jul 6, 2004, at 2:08 PM, Sebastien Bigaret wrote:
>
> I currently have very very little time, so please excuse this too short
> answer.
>
> Duncan McGreggor <[email protected]> wrote:
>> Hey folks,
>>
>> I am aware that checking for changes in a database source data is not
>> supported yet, but I am attempting to do this anyway...
>>
>> What I want to do is a fetch, and then operate on the data, then
>> before I
>> save the changes, fetch again to see if the source has changed at
>> all. I
>> have methods that do this, however... the data seems to be cached
>> during the
>> call to EditingContext(), as the fetch pulls the same data over and
>> over,
>> not matter how much I change the source data.
>
> Fine! --> what you need here is (again!) definitely optimistic locking.
>
> To answer your questions: yes, row snapshots are cached, and this leads
> to the limitation you already noticed. Is there an easy way to get a
> fresh snapshot? Sorry, not in the current state.
>
> I initially thought this was somewhere on a branch, but the recent
> discussion we had with Ernesto proved that this only lies on my
> hard-disk.
>
> I believe that you want to go this way because you need it; same as
> for Ernesto.
>
> I've put there a tarball containing the current state for optimistic
> locking:
> https://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?
> func=detail&aid=986122&group_id=58935&atid=489338
>
> There's a patch against the current CVS head and some additional
> files, full content is:
>
> optimistic_locking.patch
> Modeling/DefaultEditingContextDelegate.py
> Modeling/EditingContextDefaultDelegate.py
> Modeling/interfaces/EditingContextDelegate.py
> Modeling/tests/test_EditingContext_optimistic_locking.py
>
> I'm sorry I've not enough time to comment right now, but at least it is
> functional; you can refer to the tests that are contained in module
> test_EditingContext_optimistic_locking.py
>
> Hopefully this will be a good starting point for all of you needing
> the feature; please just keep in mind this is alpha software. Any
> feedbacks will be greatly appreciated!
>
> Last: by now I cannot give a exhaustive overview of the current
> limitations, however the tests comment some of these. Plus, do not try
> to make it work w/ nested ECs unless you know what you're doing (and
> since I've no time to check this right now, I'd say I do not know what
> sort of weird effects you can get if you try this with nested ECs!).
>
> -- Sébastien.
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email sponsored by Black Hat Briefings & Training.
Attend Black Hat Briefings & Training, Las Vegas July 24-29 -
digital self defense, top technical experts, no vendor pitches,
unmatched networking opportunities. Visit www.blackhat.com