Re: Another question about sessions and EditingContexts (sorry)
"Ernesto Revilla" <[email protected]> Mon, 1 Mar 2004 13:27:18 +0100
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.python.modeling |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <001b01c3ff89$7910ea60$0100a8c0@servidor> |
Dear Sébastien, Yes, actually I have time to do some testing in a test environment (no production) with sqlite and Postgresql. (And I'm sorry I couldn't help you with python metaclasses in the past.) I'm also very interested in optimistic locking. With best regards, Erny ----- Original Message ----- From: "Sebastien Bigaret" <[email protected]> To: "Ernesto Revilla" <[email protected]> Cc: "modeling-users" <[email protected]> Sent: Sunday, February 29, 2004 2:37 PM Subject: Re: [Modeling-users] Another question about sessions and EditingContexts (sorry) "Ernesto Revilla" <[email protected]> wrote: > Dear all, > > as stated in the documentation, section 6. Integration in an application, > using an application server, actually it is recomended to use a fresh > EditingContext for each session. But it states also, that changes made > permanent with saveChanges will not be visible to other EditingContexts. Is > the also the case for Zope ZEditingContextSessioning? Could anybody tell me > in which environment she/he uses modeling, and how he treats the > EditingContexts? (I'm looking for application server like uses.) This is the case in every multi-ECs environment, including Zope and ZECSessioning. I currently have the intention of solving that longstanding issue of synchronizing ECs --and this is a prerequisite for optimistic locking. Would you have some time testing patches on that topic? -- Sébastien. ------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net is sponsored by: Speed Start Your Linux Apps Now. Build and deploy apps & Web services for Linux with a free DVD software kit from IBM. Click Now! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id56&alloc_id438&op=click