Re: N-tier development and modeling

Federico Heinz <[email protected]> Thu, 11 Mar 2004 01:42:17 +0000 (UTC)
Newsgroups gmane.comp.python.modeling
Organization Fundacion Via Libre
Message-ID <1078969339.800.39.camel@michelle>
On Wed, 2004-03-10 at 18:45, Tom Hallman wrote:
>   Thanks for that input. A question - would using such a method (via Pyro, 
> etc.) bind us to using clients exclusively written in Python? For example, 
> if we wanted a client to be written in PHP or Java, we wouldn't be able to 
> use that Distributed Objects method. Is that correct?

I'm not familiar with Pyro at all, so I'm afraid I can't comment on
that. If it were properly implemented, you ought to be able to cross
language boundaries (I remember java apps could call Distributed Objects
at some point in history), but certain assumptions would have to be true
in the target language. For instance, it would have to implement some
form of true message passing, and not mere polymorphism (i.e. no C++).

	Fede

-- 
GnuPG Public Key: gpg --keyserver wwwkeys.eu.pgp.net --recv-key BD02C6E0
Key Fingerprint: 04F4 08C5 14B7 2C3D DB21  ACF8 6CF5 0B0C BD02 C6E0
signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, 189 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQBAT8P7bPULDL0CxuARAnLbAKDQBRqR7zZexm0zwXbttFsNZdFvcwCgmovJ
cYvNoIjFoV0BXXBP0Cjn6rg=
=I81D
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----