Re: Interfaces in hierarchcal way
Christopher Felton <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.python.myhdl |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
<snip> > > Hi Chris, > > I was looking at the interface of the verilog modules, not at the body. > For axi4s_reg the generated verilog gives: > -- > module axi4s_reg ( > clk, > rst, > ai_valid, > ai_data, > ai_accept, > ao_valid, > ao_data, > ao_accept > ); > -- > For axi4_lite_reg the verilog start with: > -- > module axi4_lite_reg ( > clk, > rst > ); > -- > So all other ports (defined in a hierarchical interface) are gone... I was > expecting something like: > -- > module axi4_lite_reg ( > clk, > rst, > aw_ai_valid, > aw_ai_data, > aw_ai_accept, > aw_ao_valid, > aw_ao_data, > aw_ao_accept, > ... > w_ai_valid, > w_ai_data, > w_ai_accept, > ... > ); > -- > > Or am I missing something? I expect all signals are used... > Sorry for the confusion, yes the ports should exist. Not sure what happened here? I looks likes, as you suspected, with the hierarchical interfaces there is a top-level port conversion bug. Regards, Chris ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Don't Limit Your Business. Reach for the Cloud. GigeNET's Cloud Solutions provide you with the tools and support that you need to offload your IT needs and focus on growing your business. Configured For All Businesses. Start Your Cloud Today. https://www.gigenetcloud.com/