Re: Block return values (myhdl.BlockError)

Jos Huisken <[email protected]> Fri, 13 May 2016 14:45:41 +0000 (UTC)
Newsgroups gmane.comp.python.myhdl
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Jan Decaluwe <jan <at> jandecaluwe.com> writes:

> I have nothing against collecting good ideas.
> 
> However, for this specific feature, I am unconvinced
> that the additional complexity is warranted. I may
> change that opinion with future evidence - until
> now it has only been brought up once as an alternative
> possibility and does not seem enough.

I didn't expect to raise such discussion ;-), and I guess we have to give 
it more thought. I have used all kinds of return values, next to Signals, 
especially in testbenches. The example I showed was a small part of a 
template based testbench+design which I will revisit, hopefully soon,  
with the current simplification.

> My priority is moving forward with the simplifications
> enabled by  <at> block, and I believe there are several
> much more relevant new features that these simplifications
> will make possible.
> 
> Jan
> 





------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Mobile security can be enabling, not merely restricting. Employees who
bring their own devices (BYOD) to work are irked by the imposition of MDM
restrictions. Mobile Device Manager Plus allows you to control only the
apps on BYO-devices by containerizing them, leaving personal data untouched!
https://ad.doubleclick.net/ddm/clk/304595813;131938128;j