Re: Block return values (myhdl.BlockError)
Jos Huisken <[email protected]> Fri, 13 May 2016 14:45:41 +0000 (UTC)
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.python.myhdl |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Jan Decaluwe <jan <at> jandecaluwe.com> writes: > I have nothing against collecting good ideas. > > However, for this specific feature, I am unconvinced > that the additional complexity is warranted. I may > change that opinion with future evidence - until > now it has only been brought up once as an alternative > possibility and does not seem enough. I didn't expect to raise such discussion ;-), and I guess we have to give it more thought. I have used all kinds of return values, next to Signals, especially in testbenches. The example I showed was a small part of a template based testbench+design which I will revisit, hopefully soon, with the current simplification. > My priority is moving forward with the simplifications > enabled by <at> block, and I believe there are several > much more relevant new features that these simplifications > will make possible. > > Jan > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Mobile security can be enabling, not merely restricting. Employees who bring their own devices (BYOD) to work are irked by the imposition of MDM restrictions. Mobile Device Manager Plus allows you to control only the apps on BYO-devices by containerizing them, leaving personal data untouched! https://ad.doubleclick.net/ddm/clk/304595813;131938128;j