Re: Current policy on AI-generated code in NumPy
Oscar Benjamin via NumPy-Discussion <[email protected]> Fri, 6 Feb 2026 23:07:13 +0000
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.python.numeric.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAHVvXxS3pnSGSsR+MG2eO1n_VBGQzL7LB=rExGU2rGRDS+3eXA@mail.gmail.com> |
On Fri, 6 Feb 2026 at 22:44, Andrew Nelson via NumPy-Discussion <[email protected]> wrote: > > Something we're also seeing is AI being used to draft comments in PRs. I think this is understandable as English is not a first language for most people. However, it also has the effect of raising suspicions (rightly or wrongly) as to whether the code changes were produced by AI as well. I actually think that this is a bigger problem than people using AI to write code. If all the code is written by AI (and it will be) then human-to-human communication is the way to build trust. Allowing AIs to poison that breaks everything. Honestly now I find it reassuring to see broken English, typos, lazy markdown formatting, grammatical errors and so on because it is so much better that I am talking to a real human. I think most people using LLMs to write comments literally don't understand this and often just need to be told. -- Oscar _______________________________________________ NumPy-Discussion mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] https://mail.python.org/mailman3//lists/numpy-discussion.python.org Member address: [email protected]