Re: Looking for volunteers (was re: Revised Optik docs)

On 27 May 2004, David Goodger said:
> Good idea to do that regardless.  Did you check the current doc files
> into CVS?  I didn't see any checkin messages on optik-checkins (last
> msg dated 2003-09-15).

optik-checkins is broken and has been for some time.  Haven't had a chance
to investigate, but it looks like the smtplib call from syncmail is bombing
on cvs.sourceforge.net.  Might just need to upgrade to a newer version of
syncmail.

> 2.3.4 was released this morning.

Yes, I noticed that shortly after my earlier post.  D'ohh!

> If we know which versions of the reST files correspond to the existing
> LaTeX, we can take diffs & modify the LaTeX manually easily enough.

I tagged the whole Optik tree with 'python-2_3' around the time of the 2.3
release -- that should reflect the "1.4.1+" code that's been in Python 2.3.
And just tonight I tagged the docs with 'optik-1_4_1-doc', since the docs
now describe Optik 1.4.1 accurately.  (Although not completely; I just
realize that we never documented help formatting fully.) So it should be
possible.

        Greg
-- 
Greg Ward <[email protected]>                         http://www.gerg.ca/
There are no stupid questions -- only stupid people.


-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by: Oracle 10g
Get certified on the hottest thing ever to hit the market... Oracle 10g. 
Take an Oracle 10g class now, and we'll give you the exam FREE.
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=3149&alloc_id=8166&op=click