Re: R: Re: conference length
Martijn Faassen <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.python.org.europe |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 04/16/2014 11:12 AM, John Pinner wrote: > Hello All, > > On 15 April 2014 20:46, roberto.polli <[email protected]> wrote: >> Right time to discuss: no. >> Right Place to discuss: probably yes. > > In fact : NO! > > The correct place to discuss this is the europython-improve list, > which was established specifically to discuss improving EuroPython, > keeping the EP list free of contention. I saw that list, but it's a private list that seems to be for EuroPython organizers (certainly not me) and active volunteers. Does just giving feedback on this make me an "active volunteer"? I don't think so. Anyway, I don't want to be caught up in a procedural quagmire where I'm told I'm sending stuff to the wrong list, and I might need to send stuff to a private mailing lists where only organizers are able to respond to me and possibly is not used anyway. Can we keep this kind of stuff out of this particular discussion please, and have it elsewhere? Regards, Martijn _______________________________________________ EuroPython 2014 Berlin, 21th27th July EuroPython mailing list [email protected] https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/europython