Re: Re: Trellis Update Blues...

At 03:42 PM 6/18/2008 +0300, Peter Damoc wrote:
>More tests and data.
>
>I've simply cached some values and started to see improvements which 
>was strange... (it means that somehow the trellis component 
>recomputes some of the measurements or provides a way slower access 
>to the results)
>
>then I pushed some of the cache code in an exterior method and timed 
>it for both versions.
>
>here is the code:
>#------- start code
>import timeit
>stmt = """
>def render_nimf_distance_anim(mp):
>     n_hdev = mp.n_hdev
>     n_hdev2 = mp.n_hdev2
>     n_vdev = mp.n_vdev
>     n_vdev2 = mp.n_vdev2
>     breast_base_h = mp.breast_base_h
>     breast_base_h2 = mp.breast_base_h2
>     lower_pole = mp.lower_pole
>     lower_pole2 = mp.lower_pole2
>     lower_pole_base = mp.lower_pole_base
>     lower_pole_base2 = mp.lower_pole_base2
>     lower_pole_with_ptosis = mp.lower_pole_with_ptosis
>     lower_pole_with_ptosis2 = mp.lower_pole_with_ptosis2
>     future_nimf = mp.future_nimf
>     future_nimf2 = mp.future_nimf2
>     future_imf_pos = mp.future_imf_pos
>     future_imf_pos2 = mp.future_imf_pos2
>     incision_pos = mp.incision_pos
>     incision_pos2 = mp.incision_pos2
>
>from measurements import Measurements, MeasurementsProxy
>
>m = Measurements()
>mp = MeasurementsProxy()
>for x in range(100):
>     render_nimf_distance_anim(mp)"""
>t = timeit.Timer(stmt=stmt)
>print t.timeit(number=10)
>
>#------- end code
>
>the results were:
>0.7a2: 36.40 seconds
>0.6a3: 0.55 seconds
>
>The only thing I modified was replacing trellis.values with 
>trellis.attrs and trellis.rule with trellis.compute (trellis.rules 
>with trellis.compute.attrs)
>
>Any ideas?

Please send me the code I would need to actually reproduce this, so I 
can profile it.  The code above tells me nothing about what's 
actually going on.