Re: Re: PEAK-Rules bug
"Phillip J. Eby" <pje-Wh6+Hckhi6HFNGf7iClzIwC/[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.python.peak |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
At 01:08 AM 6/25/2008 +0300, Sergey Schetinin wrote: >This IS a bug, right? Yes. I just got back from a trip and haven't fixed it yet. The problem is that the default "inclusion" bitmask needs to include (by default) all cases based on a "not" condition. I see one obvious way to fix it, but it will then break on istype(object) (i.e., if you test for something being exactly type(object), it would then be true for ANY object. So, I'm still trying to figure out how to work around that.