Re: Trellis shared cells

At 11:57 AM 12/2/2008 -0800, Jeffrey Harris wrote:
>This works fine, but it makes me uneasy.  trellis.changed is
>undocumented, and I'm not sure this will continue to work in the future.
>
>If this *is* a reasonable way to work with shared cells, would it make
>sense to make the trellis.changed call happen automatically when one
>cell is switched out for another?

Yes, I'd been thinking of doing just that (as Sergey said).

But I would caution that use cases that seem to call for modifying a 
cell in this fashion may have other, cleaner ways to be handled 
anyway.  Perhaps you could elaborate on the use case?