Re: Trellis future (forking)

At 02:22 PM 6/12/2009 +0300, Sergey Schetinin wrote:
>  * is "trellis" as package name ok? (it would be trellis-fork on pypi
>and similar)

I would request that you use a namespace package for the covering 
organization, ala osaf.*, zope.*, peak.* etc.  That is, 
'yourname.trellis', where yourname is something that identifies you 
or your organization.  It could be 'ss' if you don't already have 
such a namespace.

Other than that, good luck!  If you write any good documentation, 
tutorials, etc., would love to take a look for back-contribution, to 
the extent they are compatible.

In the long run, I hope to do more with the Trellis myself, along the 
lines of some of Coherence's features.  But then, as they say, in the 
long run we are all dead anyway.  ;-)