Re: Trellis future (forking)
"P.J. Eby" <pje-Wh6+Hckhi6HFNGf7iClzIwC/[email protected]> Thu, 25 Jun 2009 15:51:30 -0400
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.python.peak |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
At 12:29 PM 6/25/2009 +0300, Sergey Schetinin wrote: >I don't really mind DVCS's but Subversion served me so well all these >years that I just don't see a reason to move away from it. As they >say: if it's not broken -- don't fix it. Thanks for suggestions >anyway. Actually, I've found that there's an excellent reason to use DVCS: managing local changes to upstream software. I learned the basics of Mercurial last weekend and found it to be a nice improvement over svn, at least for that use case. There is even a built-in tool to pull updates from CVS, svn, and others into a Mercurial repository, and it handles merging MUCH better than svn. I plan to migrate all my own company's private-branch projects to Mercurial for that reason.