Re: DecoratorTools will not run with python -OO

Hello PJE

Thanks for your feedback. I first assumed it was a problem with the
function templating feature but I wasn't 100% sure Thanks for
confirming that. Since this isn't exclusive to TG I closed that ticket
as wontfix.

Christopher that seems like a good workaround. Do we really need
rewrap to have a docstring? perhaps it could just be declared as a
variable.

On Mon, Dec 7, 2009 at 3:45 PM, Christopher Stelma <[email protected]> wrote:
> The doc strings are needed, but you can manually assign them and
> things work fine.
>
> def rewrap(__original, __decorated):
>     """return __decorated($args)"""
> rewrap.__doc__ = """return __decorated($args)"""
>
> On Mon, Dec 7, 2009 at 1:58 PM, P.J. Eby <pje-Wh6+Hckhi6HFNGf7iClzIwC/[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> At 12:38 PM 12/7/2009 -0600, Jorge Vargas wrote:
>>>
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> Today someone reported the following "bug" with DecoratorTools. In the
>>> ticket http://trac.turbogears.org/ticket/2426 I confirmed current
>>> trunk has the problem. It's a very naive bug as the code is simply
>>> trying to update a variable that doesn't exists due to the -OO
>>> parameter. I just want to bring that up to your attention to see if
>>> this is worth fixing or not.
>>
>> It is not fixable in current versions - DecoratorTools will not work correctly without doc strings...  and anything that uses DecoratorTools' function templating feature will have the same problem.
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> PEAK mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> http://www.eby-sarna.com/mailman/listinfo/peak
>
>
>
> --
> Christopher Stelma
> Digsby Developer
> [email protected]
>