Re: Patch: Update RuleDispatch for python-2.7

Toshio Kuratomi <[email protected]> Mon, 2 Aug 2010 11:33:23 -0400
Newsgroups gmane.comp.python.peak
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On Mon, Aug 02, 2010 at 04:11:16AM -0400, P.J. Eby wrote:
> So, what I've done for now is release an 0.5.2 "compatibility
> release" of BytecodeAssembler with just the quick workarounds, then
> later I'll release an 0.6 with a more "symbolic" disassembler that
> can handle the emulations transparently for testing purposes.  (And
> with support for SETUP_WITH and some improved LIST_APPEND handling.)
> 
> Meanwhile, PEAK-Rules's svn version now appears to have only cosmetic
> test failures on 2.7, when used with BytecodeAssembler 0.5.2.  It's
> not perfect by any means, but then, it looks like most of those
> shallow failures were happening with 2.6 anyway.  ;-)
> 
> Please let me know whether this is sufficient for you to be able to
> offer PEAK-Rules on 2.7 for now.
> 
Thanks for the quick response -- I'll get 0.5.2 checked into our tree today
and forward your message to our peak-rules/bytecode-assembler maintainers so
they can make a decision about what to do about the more shallow failures.
Since we're at our Alpha release right now and have a little less than two
months to get everything in for the final release, I think this will be
sufficient for our needs but I'll leave the decision to them
:-)

Thanks!
-Toshio

_______________________________________________
PEAK mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.eby-sarna.com/mailman/listinfo/peak
signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, 198 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.14 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEARECAAYFAkxW5UMACgkQX6yAic2E7kgragCePFfuYfERgaSV9kXYUpAieZd4
le8AoIOHxfHmVG+cJreNGlTwYhMF37H7
=3tw1
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----