Re: issues while porting priority_methods to use peak.rules.predicates.priority
Christoph Zwerschke <[email protected]> Wed, 18 Aug 2010 00:58:43 +0200
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.python.peak |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Am 17.08.2010 23:21 schrieb Alberto Valverde: > Is there any way to tell peak.rules to consider that a "priority" is > always implied by any other criterion so the fact that it is present > in a predicate doesn't raise the predicate's selectiveness? (does > that make sense?) Strangely, even when I add priorities everywhere, I still get the AmbiguousMethods error, is this a bug? from peak.rules import value from peak.rules.predicates import priority f = lambda n, m: 0 f1, f2, f3 = value(1), value(2), value(3) when(f, "n==5")(f1) when(f, "m==5")(f2) when(f, "n==5 and m==5")(f3) print f(5,5) # works, returns 3 when(f, "n==5 and priority(1)")(f1) when(f, "m==5 and priority(1)")(f2) when(f, "n==5 and m==5 and priority(1)")(f3) print f(5,5) # ambiguous -- Christoph