Re: unnamed stucts

On 05/07/2008 11:36 PM, Greg Ewing wrote:
> Brad Schick wrote:
>   
>> Thanks for the feedback, but I'm not sure I see that. Pyrex won't
>> compile the code unless I use the names of the nested structs when
>> referencing those elements.
>>     
>
> Sorry, I must have been thinking of named nested structs when
> I wrote that.
>
> What you should do is flatten the struct and declare all the
> members of the nested structs and unions directly as members of
> the containing struct.
>
>   
Ok, that makes sense. Well its a bit odd, but I understand that to the
pyrex compiler only the lexical names really matter in order to generate
the C code. Thanks for the tip.

-Brad