Re: A couple of questions about pyrex

Well, I just hope so, no offense though.

yingjie


--- On Tue, 5/12/09, Yingjie Lan <[email protected]> wrote:

> From: Yingjie Lan <[email protected]>
> Subject: Re: [Pyrex] A couple of questions about pyrex
> To: "Stefan Behnel" <[email protected]>
> Cc: [email protected]
> Date: Tuesday, May 12, 2009, 5:40 PM
> OK, I see. Thanks for the clarification. Maybe someday
> somebody will make a branch of pyrex and tweak things
> around.
> 
> yingjie
> 
> 
> --- On Tue, 5/12/09, Stefan Behnel
> <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> > From: Stefan Behnel <[email protected]>
> > Subject: Re: [Pyrex] A couple of questions about pyrex
> > To: [email protected]
> > Cc: "Greg Ewing"
> <[email protected]>, [email protected]
> > Date: Tuesday, May 12, 2009, 5:18 PM
> > Yingjie Lan wrote:
> > > If 'cdef' define a function hidden from
> > python,
> > > why 'cdef class' define a class for
> python?
> > > I would expect 'cdef class' define an
> > invisible
> > > class (for internal use of the module) in a
> > > pythonic way (making things easier).
> > 
> > This is a major FAQ in Pyrex. Yes, this is
> inconsistent,
> > but it's the way
> > it is and it will not change. It also makes it hard to
> find
> > a syntax to
> > define 'private' (module-internal) classes,
> > although there will hopefully
> > be such a syntax one day (this has also been discussed
> > many, many times).
> > 
> > Stefan
> 
> 
>       
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Pyrex mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.copyleft.no/mailman/listinfo/pyrex