Re: A couple of questions about pyrex

Stefan Behnel wrote:
> It also makes it hard to find a syntax to
> define 'private' (module-internal) classes, although there will hopefully
> be such a syntax one day (this has also been discussed many, many times).

One problem with using 'private' for this is that
it wouldn't mean the opposite of 'public' (which
already exists and concerns visibility to other
C code).

-- 
Greg