Re: The Future of Python Card

--- "Smith, Frank" <[email protected]> wrote:

> I'm also a "serious beginner" and have been lurking
> on the list for
> awhile now. PythonCard is a great tool as it stands.
> Despite its
> apparent "limitations" it is suitable for most
> applications. 

Agree totally.  I can't say enough thanks to the
developers of Pythoncard.  I don't know how "complex"
and "big" a project has to be before one have to
resort to wxpython but recently I coded some 10,000
lines of purely GUI code (some 50 to 60 screens) in
about 2 week's time (see my previous postings about
creating Pythoncard controls on the fly).  May be it's
not the sexiest looking code in the universe - but it
surely made my customer (and my accountant) very
happy.  THANKS - Pythoncard.


>I would be
> interested having some sort of plotting capability
> supported - perhaps I
> might even be able to help, although I'm not sure
> how much work or skill
> it would require! Despite Kevin's note, I'm not sure
> how to go about it.
> 

For the kind of 2-D plotting I do, nothing beats
matplotlib.  There was some rumblings about
integrating matplotlib with pythoncard (there is
direct support of wxpython already) but nothing came
out of it.



--
John Henry

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc.
Still grepping through log files to find problems?  Stop.
Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser.
Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >>  http://get.splunk.com/