Re: Python 3.x progress
Andy Robinson <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.python.reportlab.user |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CABjtAptnwrHU6NJY-dqu0bCRRb3mByH=HzEtzEgy+hb8FdtePQ@mail.gmail.com> |
On 11 December 2013 15:00, Michael Hipp <[email protected]> wrote: > Will this work for us poor schmucks stuck on Windows? I was under the > impression that only the binary installers would work for Windows (and still > get the benefit of the C extensions, etc.). > No, not yet. I don't have a detailed step by step plan as this is fitting into little gaps between other projects, but roughly I am thinking... 1. eliminate need for pyRXP 2. switch branches so new code becomes trunk 3. see if we need to do any modernizing of setup.py, manifests etc - we might have old code we no longer need to support older Pythons - and generally get the build process as clean as possible on Unix-like systems 4. prepare an alpha release which will include easy_installable packages for Windows too and updated binaries. Otherwise we might just spend time fighting with each compiler more than once. Hopefully customer phone calls and other interruptions should drop off soon and get us more time... - Andy