Re: Python 3.x progress
Peter Cock <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.python.reportlab.user |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAKVJ-_6aFGmP7TSTBymup7Fx3q6pStjgX9AzYvQJjWn=JuHUaw@mail.gmail.com> |
On Thu, Jan 9, 2014 at 2:58 PM, Robin Becker <[email protected]> wrote: > ........ > >> >> Try https://gist.github.com/peterjc/8334631 which extracts the >> failing Biopython unit test as a short script. I'm working on >> further simplifying it - currently in addition to ReportLab it >> requires Biopython (using Biopython 1.63 should be fine). > > ........ > anything that requires biopython, numpy etc etc is probably too large. The gist script is self contained now. > If you are getting a type error in 3.3 then whatever strings/bytestrings etc > etc and what's being called at that point would be helpful. Hopefully you can see that now - let me know if you need the script further simplified. > > Of course dna can be very large so that may be an issue. Not in this example. > It seems the renderPS module doesn't get tested very thoroughly by the > reprotlab tests and that module is broken. Before I do anything else I will > try to get it to produce the old standard test shapes. Good plan - the same example figure in the original tests seemed to be working fine with PDF and SVG output. Most of our tests just used PDF output normally. > I and others are already testing on linux, but as renderPS won't work > differently there it's probably not worth trying your stuff there yet. Tested anyway - on Linux it made a postscript file fine under Python 2.7, but gave a TypeError under Python 3.3 just like on the Mac. Regards, Peter