Re: Python 3.x progress

Peter Cock <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.python.reportlab.user
Message-ID <CAKVJ-_6aFGmP7TSTBymup7Fx3q6pStjgX9AzYvQJjWn=JuHUaw@mail.gmail.com>
On Thu, Jan 9, 2014 at 2:58 PM, Robin Becker <[email protected]> wrote:
> ........
>
>>
>> Try https://gist.github.com/peterjc/8334631 which extracts the
>> failing Biopython unit test as a short script. I'm working on
>> further simplifying it - currently in addition to ReportLab it
>> requires Biopython (using Biopython 1.63 should be fine).
>
> ........
> anything that requires biopython, numpy etc etc is probably too large.

The gist script is self contained now.

> If you are getting a type error in 3.3 then whatever strings/bytestrings etc
> etc and what's being called at that point would be helpful.

Hopefully you can see that now - let me know if you need the script
further simplified.

>
> Of course dna can be very large so that may be an issue.

Not in this example.

> It seems the renderPS module doesn't get tested very thoroughly by the
> reprotlab tests and that module is broken. Before I do anything else I will
> try to get it to produce the old standard test shapes.

Good plan - the same example figure in the original tests seemed
to be working fine with PDF and SVG output. Most of our tests
just used PDF output normally.

> I and others are already testing on linux, but as renderPS won't work
> differently there it's probably not worth trying your stuff there yet.

Tested anyway - on Linux it made a postscript file fine under
Python 2.7, but gave a TypeError under Python 3.3 just like on
the Mac.

Regards,

Peter
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.