Re: calculating the jacobian for a least-squares problem

[email protected]
Newsgroups gmane.comp.python.scientific.user
Message-ID <CAMMTP+DzmExLxFrxn0Cg=OsNaJNHP8_1T_hEaO7ib4B2+ZMT9g@mail.gmail.com>
On Mon, Mar 26, 2018 at 7:57 PM, Andrew Nelson <[email protected]> wrote:
> I would like to calculate the Jacobian for a least squares problem, followed
> by a Hessian estimation, then the covariance matrix from that Hessian.
>
> With my current approach I sometimes experience issues with the covariance
> matrix in that it's sometimes not positive semi-definite. I am using the
> covariance matrix to seed a MCMC sampling process by supplying it to
> `np.random.multivariate_normal` to get initial positions for the MC chain.

I never looked much at the details of MCMC.
But if your data or starting point doesn't provide good information about the
Hessian, then, I think, you could shrink the hessian to or combine it with the
prior covariance matrix, e.g. use a weighted average.

Josef


 I
> am using the following code:
>
> ```
> from scipy.optimize._numdiff import approx_derivative
> jac = approx_derivative(residuals_func, x0)
> hess = np.matmul(jac.T, jac)
> covar = np.linalg.inv(hess)
> ```
>
> Note that x0 may not be at a minimum.
>
> - would this be the usual way of estimating the Hessian, is there anything
> incorrect with the approach?
> - what is the recommended way (i.e. numerically stable) of inverting the
> Hessian in such a situation?
> - does `optimize.leastsq` do anything different?
> - if `x0` is not at a minimum should the covariance matrix be expected to be
> positive semi-definite anyway?
>
> _______________________________________________
> SciPy-User mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/scipy-user
>
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.