Re: Error estimation when using solve_ivp

Nicolas Cellier <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.python.scientific.user
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Usually the Runge kutta method has an error estimate built-in. It may be possible to have access to it, or to build a child class based on the default RK solver used in the ivp_solve that expose that error. 

Le 1 avr. 2018 22:10, à 22:10, Lingyi Hu <[email protected]> a écrit:
> Hi,
>
>I would like to get an error estimate on my results from
>`scipy.integrate.solve_ivp`. I am using it to solve a few differential
>equations, and using the its root-finding capabilities to get the
>coordinates when an event happens. This is all good, but I'm not sure
>how
>to put an error estimate on my result.
>
>I have an idea of how to estimate the global error of a Runge Kutta
>method
>with a fixed step size, but it seems `solve_ivp` uses adaptive step
>sizes.
>It would be great if someone who has experience with this could point
>me in
>the right direction. I don't exactly need a highly rigorous estimation
>of
>the error, just a rough upper bound will do.
>
>Thanks!
>Lingyi
>
>
>------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>_______________________________________________
>SciPy-User mailing list
>[email protected]
>https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/scipy-user

_______________________________________________
SciPy-User mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/scipy-user
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.