Re: Why stats.fisher_exact gives results different from R?
Stuart Reynolds <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.python.scientific.user |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAAy-kdnsj65-E9sOdv8xj0gGtjpvTK1SxJ8tnodgeUE5-1GeeA@mail.gmail.com> |
Also: BUG: stats: fisher_exact returns incorrect p-value https://github.com/scipy/scipy/issues/4130 - Stu On Sat, Apr 6, 2019 at 12:37 PM Stuart Reynolds <[email protected]> wrote: > > Also see: > https://github.com/brentp/fishers_exact_test/issues/18 > .... it's a **much** faster implementation of fisher's exact, and also > differs from scipy.stats.fisher_exact. > I think the brentp implementation is the same as R's -- actually would > be good to test this and update the issue. > > - Stuart > > > On Sat, Apr 6, 2019 at 6:22 AM <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > On Sat, Apr 6, 2019 at 9:02 AM Peng Yu <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > See below for the output of python and R. > > > > > > Why there is a difference in the odds ratio? Given that R is most > > > widely used by statisticians, I'd prefer the python version print the > > > same results. Also, confidence intervals are missing in the python's > > > output. > > > > > > >>> stats.fisher_exact([[8, 2], [1, 5]]) > > > (20.0, 0.03496503496503495) > > > > > > R> fisher.test(rbind(c(8, 2), c(1,5))) > > > > > > Fisher's Exact Test for Count Data > > > > > > data: rbind(c(8, 2), c(1, 5)) > > > p-value = 0.03497 > > > alternative hypothesis: true odds ratio is not equal to 1 > > > 95 percent confidence interval: > > > 1.008849 1049.791446 > > > sample estimates: > > > odds ratio > > > 15.46969 > > > > estimate > > an estimate of the odds ratio. Note that the conditional Maximum > > Likelihood Estimate (MLE) rather than the unconditional MLE (the > > sample odds ratio) is used. Only present in the 2 by 2 case. > > https://stat.ethz.ch/R-manual/R-devel/library/stats/html/fisher.test.html > > > > scipy shows sample odds ratio > > > > The R help page does not show which confidence interval method they > > use, and I don't remember or never knew. > > > > Josef > > > > > > > > -- > > > Regards, > > > Peng > > > _______________________________________________ > > > SciPy-User mailing list > > > [email protected] > > > https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/scipy-user > > _______________________________________________ > > SciPy-User mailing list > > [email protected] > > https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/scipy-user