Re: Why stats.fisher_exact gives results different from R?

Stuart Reynolds <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.python.scientific.user
Message-ID <CAAy-kdnsj65-E9sOdv8xj0gGtjpvTK1SxJ8tnodgeUE5-1GeeA@mail.gmail.com>
Also:

BUG: stats: fisher_exact returns incorrect p-value
https://github.com/scipy/scipy/issues/4130

- Stu

On Sat, Apr 6, 2019 at 12:37 PM Stuart Reynolds
<[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Also see:
>     https://github.com/brentp/fishers_exact_test/issues/18
> .... it's a **much** faster implementation of fisher's exact, and also
> differs from scipy.stats.fisher_exact.
> I think the brentp implementation is the same as R's -- actually would
> be good to test this and update the issue.
>
> - Stuart
>
>
> On Sat, Apr 6, 2019 at 6:22 AM <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > On Sat, Apr 6, 2019 at 9:02 AM Peng Yu <[email protected]> wrote:
> > >
> > > See below for the output of python and R.
> > >
> > > Why there is a difference in the odds ratio? Given that R is most
> > > widely used by statisticians, I'd prefer the python version print the
> > > same results. Also, confidence intervals are missing in the python's
> > > output.
> > >
> > > >>> stats.fisher_exact([[8, 2], [1, 5]])
> > > (20.0, 0.03496503496503495)
> > >
> > > R> fisher.test(rbind(c(8, 2), c(1,5)))
> > >
> > >     Fisher's Exact Test for Count Data
> > >
> > > data:  rbind(c(8, 2), c(1, 5))
> > > p-value = 0.03497
> > > alternative hypothesis: true odds ratio is not equal to 1
> > > 95 percent confidence interval:
> > >     1.008849 1049.791446
> > > sample estimates:
> > > odds ratio
> > >   15.46969
> >
> > estimate
> > an estimate of the odds ratio. Note that the conditional Maximum
> > Likelihood Estimate (MLE) rather than the unconditional MLE (the
> > sample odds ratio) is used. Only present in the 2 by 2 case.
> > https://stat.ethz.ch/R-manual/R-devel/library/stats/html/fisher.test.html
> >
> > scipy shows sample odds ratio
> >
> > The R help page does not show which confidence interval method they
> > use, and I don't remember or never knew.
> >
> > Josef
> >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Regards,
> > > Peng
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > SciPy-User mailing list
> > > [email protected]
> > > https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/scipy-user
> > _______________________________________________
> > SciPy-User mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/scipy-user
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.