Re: The different results given by scipy and https://quaternions.online/ when converting Euler angles to Quaternion representation.
Jerome Kieffer <[email protected]> Thu, 29 Oct 2020 08:19:38 +0100
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.python.scientific.user |
|---|---|
| Organization | ESRF |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Wed, 28 Oct 2020 09:27:47 +0100 Guillaume Gay <[email protected]> wrote: > I'd test with 'obvious' cases to get to the bottom of that, but I mostly > think one should trust scipy to do "the right thing" as it has had more > scrutiny than the website. One of the reference piece of code I know is the one from C. Gohlke: https://github.com/malcolmreynolds/transformations It support the full zoology of euler angles (there are 24 different conventions) Maybe it will help you to sort out who is doing what. -- Jérôme Kieffer _______________________________________________ SciPy-User mailing list [email protected] https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/scipy-user