Re: I have something I'd like to use the farm for.
Neal Norwitz <[email protected]> Wed, 05 Feb 2003 13:44:52 -0500
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.python.snake-farm.user |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Wed, Feb 05, 2003 at 05:43:54PM +0000, Michael Hudson wrote: > Ages ago, I wrote and checked in a patch that added sigprocmask() and > so on to the signal module. > > This broke in a variety of exciting ways on a variety of platforms[1], > and after a while I just disabled the code in configure that checks > for sigprocmask. The code, docs and tests are still there. > > Clearly before 2.3, this needs to be sorted out: either we need to > find out which platforms it has a hope in hell of working on and > enable it there, or we need to rip it out. > > Would it be possible to test this out on the snake farm's systems? > It's not suited to automated testing as various platforms breakage > involved hanging. Yes. Did you test it on the SF compile farm? Those machines are faster/less loaded, so build/test cycles are faster. You can post a patch on SF and assign to me if you'd like. The snake farm can test on AIX, Solaris, HP-UX, Linux/Alpha. The SF compile farm has FreeBSD. You can also join the HP (Compaq) test drive program to test on Tru64 (OSF/1 on Alpha), HP-UX, *BSD, Linux, etc. Test drive info can be found here: http://www.testdrive.compaq.com Neal