Re: I have something I'd like to use the farm for.

Neal Norwitz <[email protected]> Wed, 05 Feb 2003 13:44:52 -0500
Newsgroups gmane.comp.python.snake-farm.user
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On Wed, Feb 05, 2003 at 05:43:54PM +0000, Michael Hudson wrote:
> Ages ago, I wrote and checked in a patch that added sigprocmask() and
> so on to the signal module.
> 
> This broke in a variety of exciting ways on a variety of platforms[1],
> and after a while I just disabled the code in configure that checks
> for sigprocmask.  The code, docs and tests are still there.
> 
> Clearly before 2.3, this needs to be sorted out: either we need to
> find out which platforms it has a hope in hell of working on and
> enable it there, or we need to rip it out.
> 
> Would it be possible to test this out on the snake farm's systems?
> It's not suited to automated testing as various platforms breakage
> involved hanging.

Yes.  Did you test it on the SF compile farm?  Those machines
are faster/less loaded, so build/test cycles are faster.

You can post a patch on SF and assign to me if you'd like.  The snake
farm can test on AIX, Solaris, HP-UX, Linux/Alpha.  The SF compile
farm has FreeBSD.  You can also join the HP (Compaq) test drive
program to test on Tru64 (OSF/1 on Alpha), HP-UX, *BSD, Linux, etc.
Test drive info can be found here: http://www.testdrive.compaq.com

Neal