Spyce on WSGI

Jonathan Ellis mentioned creating a spyceRequest subclass for
WSGI on his blog before at:

http://spyced.blogspot.com/2006/11/translating-spyce-form-tags.html

Any chance we'll see this?  I've been looking at Mako as a possible
Spyce replacement.  The problem with Mako is that it is merely
a templating language and you have to pair it with a server and
a whole bunch of other crap/rigmarole.

Frankly I am SICK-TO-DEATH of having to figure out all the so-called
solutions out there (I've looked at: Pylons, Paste, Cherry.py,
Turbogears, Spawning, Django, Werkzeug, web2py, web.py, Bottle,
GAE, WebStack, and god knows half a dozen more stuff) which are
all an order of magnitude more complicated than Spyce.

Good grief, I just want to set up a bunch of configuration lines
with Apache and be able to just do:

<% print "yo" %>

and be done with it.  Now *THAT* is Pythonic.

We need a mod_wsgi version because mod_python is getting long
in the tooth.  You can still do fcgi (with lighttpd only I
think, Apache doesn't work) and proxied (load-balanced?)
standalone server, but I would really prefer a mod_xxxx
(mod_wsgi) solution which seems to have a long life ahead
of it.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Beautiful is writing same markup. Internet Explorer 9 supports
standards for HTML5, CSS3, SVG 1.1,  ECMAScript5, and DOM L2 & L3.
Spend less time writing and  rewriting code and more time creating great
experiences on the web. Be a part of the beta today.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/beautyoftheweb