Re: bug in svn version

Jonathan Ellis wrote:
>> This, if done, will break the 2.2 compatibility, but leave us to 
>> user the "super" operator. Do you think that into the next release
>>  you'll change this?
> 
> I don't think "super" is a sufficient reason to break 2.2 
> compatibility.

Yes, I'm wrong. "super" was introduced into 2.2, sorry.

> 
> But maybe a patch that added
> 
> try; __metaclass__ = type except NameError: pass
> 
> to each module would be okay.  Still kind of ugly, though.
> 
Yes, also I don't like this, but why don't add the class foo(object) ?

>> and spyce didn't restart... This don't seem to happen on: 
>> concurrency = 'fork'
> 
> Doesn't really surprise me.

:)

> 
> I should really probably just take "fork" out; threading is a better 
> model for Spyce anyway, and modern Linux supports threading just 
> fine. (Historically, Linux threads kinda sucked vs Windows or 
> Solaris.)
> 
> What's your reasoning behind using the forking server?

Just today, I and other python-Italian-users on it.comp.lang.python, was
talking about the performances of various web-frameworks, and I publish
some benchmark about spyce on my platforms and It can be seen that it
*very slow* with concurrency="fork", so I don't want to use it...

You can find them here (ok this are in Italian language, but there are
only numbers... If you want I can translate it )

http://tinyurl.com/fxrss
http://tinyurl.com/e8ll2

> 
> -Jonathan

Thanks,
Michele


-------------------------------------------------------
Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security?
Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier
Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642