Re: bug in svn version

Jonathan Ellis wrote:
>> Yes and no, because on my Athlon(tm) XP 2600+, with "fork" I have:
>> 
>> Requests per second:    6.83 [#/sec] (mean) Time per request:
>> 7319.638 [ms] (mean) Time per request:       146.393 [ms] (mean,
>> across all concurrent requests) Transfer rate:          55.95
>> [Kbytes/sec] received
> 
> Ah, I see.  That's the problem with not understanding Italian. :)
> 

  :)

> In any case, I've removed forking as a concurrency option and
> switched threading to a pooled architecture.  (Before it just used 
> SocketServer.TCPServer which spawns a n ew thread for each request.)
> 
Thanks!

> I'd be curious to see how your numbers compare with the new code.
> (Make sure you've switched to the sourceforge repository: you should
> be at revision 850 for this.)

I'm trying with two pc into two different location, but I can't able to
update my repository from sf.net and I can't "browse the repository",
like wrote on sf.net site. The same happen yesterday... But why sf.net
switch to svn? cvs worked so well...

However, can you create a tar.gz, with the modified files?

> 
> -J

Michele


-------------------------------------------------------
Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security?
Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier
Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642