Re: Oddball question regarding .spy name
"Jonathan Ellis" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.python.spyce.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Mon, 31 Jul 2006 21:59:43 -0400, "Dustin " <[email protected]> said: > I love the name Spyce, but I was wondering if anyone has ever had any > weird > complaints about the default extension being .spy. Yes, I know I could > change this, but I don't mind supporting the extension name. I haven't > yet > gone public with any Spyce work yet, but was curious if anyone has > complained about the existance of "spy" in the URL. It's definitely "in" for developers right now to have extensionless URLs, but in my experience, end users don't really care. > Also, Jonathan, I know you're busy with 2.1, but just a FYI I was on the > site and ran into a demo that doesn't work. I really don't care that it > doens't work, but I was just being nosy and decided to click on it. It's > the > pooling page that doesn't work - > http://spyce.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/eg/pool.spy Yeah, this has been fixed. -Jonathan -- C++ is history repeated as tragedy. Java is history repeated as farce. --Scott McKay ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys -- and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV