Re: LLM comparison
Mats Wichmann <[email protected]> Mon, 15 Jan 2024 13:00:17 -0700
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.python.tutor |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 1/15/24 12:12, dn via Tutor wrote: > There was no need for ChatGPT (response 3) to import itertools (it's not > used anyway) - the built-in function does the job. in fact, as written, it's incorrect: from itertools import range that will cause an import error. > That Claude2 failed to suggest a list-comprehension was a surprise. What > do you think? "Modern" Python lore tends to favor comprehensions and deemphasize lambdas, so yes, this is a bit strange. > The intermediate programmer leverages the built-in range() function and typecasts it to a list directly. I also am not a favorite of using the term "type cast" for Python. Maybe it's just me, but you're not reinterpreting the type of an object, you're creating a new one from the value of the original one. However, I've been known to get hung up on language usage, it does seem to be a widely used term. _______________________________________________ Tutor maillist - [email protected] To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/tutor