Re: asynchronous WSGI implementation

[email protected] ha scritto:
> On Apr 9, 2010, at 7:20 AM, Manlio Perillo wrote:
> 
>> Steve Steiner (listsin) ha scritto:
> 
>>> Maybe put on BitBucket?  It'd sure be easier to patch/submit pull requests/file tickets on a public repo.
>>>
>> I will think about it.
>> I don't have experience with BitBucket.  Is the issue tracker good?
> 
> It's more than good enough and free.
> 

Well, for free I should be able to get some shared hosting with Mailman
and Trac support.

> [...]
>> However please note that I plan to use it for testing purpose only, and
>> not in production (at least in the near future).
> 
> The Twisted version for testing only, or both versions for testing only?
> 

Twisted version.

> [...]
>> The geenlet middleware will use this extension to implement coroutine
>> support over a simple asynchronous WSGI implementation.
>>
>> By "simple" I mean that greenlets are not used inside WSGI
>> implementation (since greenlets can not be used in my
>> ngx_http_wsgi_module, if I'm not wrong).
>>
>> greenlets are not required, but without coroutines applications will be
>> a mess, due to generator usage.
> 
> I guess I'm not real clear on what you're saying here.
> 

This is not simple to explain, for me.

It is the reason why I'm trying writing code that will make more easy to
document what I'm trying to do ;-)

> [...]


Manlio