Re: PB vs Foolscap vs AMP?

Great, thanks! It would be great if someone had done comparisons with
txZMQ<https://github.com/smira/txZMQ>as well
but I guess I'll have to play with that myself.

Jacek

On Thu, Mar 8, 2012 at 5:50 PM, Glyph Lefkowitz <[email protected]>wrote:

>
> On Mar 8, 2012, at 2:45 PM, Jacek Furmankiewicz wrote:
>
> I am trying to do some research on what is the most performant method for
> a Twisted server to speak to a client running in a separate process.
>
>
> The default solution in Twisted seems to be Perspective Broker, but then
> there is AMP and Foolscap as well.
>
> Has anyone ever done any benchmarks comparing those? I'd like to have an
> idea as to which one is most likely to give me the best performance.
>
>
> AMP is fastest.  It's not really possible to *directly* compare, because
> PB and Foolscap respectively have more features, but compare here:
>
>
> http://speed.twistedmatrix.com/timeline/?exe=2%2C4&base=none&ben=pb&env=d3&revs=200
>
> and
>
>
> http://speed.twistedmatrix.com/timeline/?exe=2%2C4&base=none&ben=amp&env=d3&revs=200
>
> You're of course welcome to contribute optimizations to PB :).
>
> -glyph
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Twisted-web mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://twistedmatrix.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/twisted-web
>
>

_______________________________________________
Twisted-web mailing list
[email protected]
http://twistedmatrix.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/twisted-web