Re: covering a sphere with patches

kirby urner <[email protected]> Tue, 17 Apr 2012 11:04:27 -0700
Newsgroups gmane.comp.python.visualpython.user
Message-ID <CAPJgG3Sf1NaCjZJmgtAajr0GL4buDmo3b3hf4=+GVGvbA_aVNg@mail.gmail.com>
> OK, I know, I forgot the octahedron...
> Then, the subdivision of the faces you obtain into smaller ones should not
> be too difficult.
>
> Jerzy Karczmarczuk
>

The triangles of a geodesic sphere e.g. subdivided icosahedron, are
not equal area though, not exactly.  Maybe exactness is not critical.

There are lots of reflections so don't have to compute a full sphere.
1/120th is a common patch to reflect around, based on rhombic
triacontahedron breaking into 4 triangles.

There's a book coming out any day now, 'Divided Spheres' by Edward
Popko that should have a lot of good info.

Kirby

http://www.amazon.com/Divided-Spheres-Geodesics-Orderly-Subdivision/dp/1466504293
> PS. People who want always have one nice mathematical formula for some
> spherical problems too often forget that it is not necessary to have two
> singularities at the poles, just one is possible with the stereographic
> projection. But the distortions are awful...
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Better than sec? Nothing is better than sec when it comes to
> monitoring Big Data applications. Try Boundary one-second
> resolution app monitoring today. Free.
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/Boundary-dev2dev
> _______________________________________________
> Visualpython-users mailing list
> Visualpython-users-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/visualpython-users
>

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Better than sec? Nothing is better than sec when it comes to
monitoring Big Data applications. Try Boundary one-second 
resolution app monitoring today. Free.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/Boundary-dev2dev