Re: PEP 444 feature request - Futures executor
Timothy Farrell <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.python.web |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <31198151.34.1294433566856.JavaMail.root@boaz> |
----- Original Message ----- From: "P.J. Eby" <pje-Wh6+Hckhi6HFNGf7iClzIwC/[email protected]> To: "Timothy Farrell" <[email protected]>, [email protected] Sent: Friday, January 7, 2011 2:14:20 PM Subject: Re: [Web-SIG] PEP 444 feature request - Futures executor > This seems like a potentially good way to do it; I suggest making it > a wsgi.org extension; see (and update) > http://www.wsgi.org/wsgi/Specifications with your proposal. > > I would suggest including a simple sample executor wrapper that > servers could use to block all but the methods allowed by your > proposal. (i.e., presumably not shutdown(), for example.) OK, will do. _______________________________________________ Web-SIG mailing list [email protected] Web SIG: http://www.python.org/sigs/web-sig Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/web-sig/gcpw-web-sig%40m.gmane.org