Re: PEP 444 / WSGI 2 Async

Alice Bevan–McGregor <alice-h+KYGxXtFYrqlBn2x/[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.python.web
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On 2011-01-07 09:04:07 -0800, Antoine Pitrou said:
> WSGI doesn't mandate any specific feature of generators, such as 
> coroutine-like semantics, and the server doesn't have to know about 
> them.

The joy of writing a new specification is that we are not (potentially) 
shackled by old ways of doing things.  Case in point: dropping 
start_response and changing the return value.  PEP 444 isn't WSGI 1, 
and can change things, including additional changes to the allowable 
return value.

	- Alice.


_______________________________________________
Web-SIG mailing list
[email protected]
Web SIG: http://www.python.org/sigs/web-sig
Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/web-sig/gcpw-web-sig%40m.gmane.org
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.