Re: PEP 444 feature request - Futures executor
Alice Bevan–McGregor <alice-h+KYGxXtFYrqlBn2x/[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.python.web |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 2011-01-07 16:39:46 -0800, Alex Grönholm said: > I believe allowing wsgi.executor to be either a process pool or a > thread pool is a recipe for disaster. I'm really not sure where to go > from here. Two solutions: :: Don't pass an executor to the job such that it can not schedule its own futures. :: Mandate a thread pool, not process pool, to avoid deadlocking. - Alice. _______________________________________________ Web-SIG mailing list [email protected] Web SIG: http://www.python.org/sigs/web-sig Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/web-sig/gcpw-web-sig%40m.gmane.org