Re: Server-side async API implementation sketches
Alice Bevan–McGregor <alice-h+KYGxXtFYrqlBn2x/[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.python.web |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 2011-01-08 13:16:52 -0800, P.J. Eby said: > In the limit case, it appears that any WSGI 1 server could provide an > (emulated) async WSGI2 implementation, simply by wrapping WSGI2 apps > with a finished version of the decorator in my sketch. > > Or, since users could do it themselves, this would mean that WSGI2 > deployment wouldn't be dependent on all server implementers immediately > turning out their own WSGI2 implementations. This, if you'll pardon my language, is bloody awesome. :D That would strongly drive adoption of WSGI2. Note that adapting a WSGI1 application to WSGI2 server would likewise be very handy, and I suspect, even easier to implement. - Alice. _______________________________________________ Web-SIG mailing list [email protected] Web SIG: http://www.python.org/sigs/web-sig Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/web-sig/gcpw-web-sig%40m.gmane.org