Re: OT: dotted names (Was: Re: A Python Web Application Package and Format)

On 06:22 pm, alice-h+KYGxXtFYrqlBn2x/[email protected] wrote:
>On 2011-04-15 11:02:17 -0700, Jim Fulton said:
>>On Fri, Apr 15, 2011 at 1:32 PM, Éric Araujo <[email protected]> 
>>wrote:
>>>As an aside, I wonder why people use dot+colon notation instead of 
>>>just dots to reference callables.  In distutils2 for example we 
>>>resolve dotted names to find command classes, command hooks and 
>>>compilers.  So what 19s the benefit, marginally easier parsing?
>>
>>An opportunity of using a colon is that it allows::
>>
>>    dotted.module.name:expression
>>
>>where expression may be more than just a name::
>>
>>   foo.bar:Bar()
>
>Or foo.bar:Baz.factory.
>
>I wouldn't go so far as to eval() what's after the colon.  The real 
>difference is this:
>
>[foo.bar]:[Baz.factory]
>|         ^- Attribute lookup.
>^- Module lookup.
>
>You can't do this:
>
>import foo.bar.Baz.factory

But you can certainly imagine a function `foo` which accepts 
"foo.bar.Baz.factory" and returns the appropriate object.  The ":" 
doesn't really buy you anything.

Jean-Paul

_______________________________________________
Web-SIG mailing list
[email protected]
Web SIG: http://www.python.org/sigs/web-sig
Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/web-sig/gcpw-web-sig%40m.gmane.org