Re: Move www.wsgi.org to Read The Docs

I'm still not sure about the intended workflow:
1. wsgi.org content repository is on github which is developer friendly.
    But, who decides about write access? In pratice, this might not be
    a problem though, because it's only a handfull people anyway, who
    are actively contributing.
2. The actual pages (sphinx?) should then be hosted by ReadTheDocs?

Where does the wsgi.org domain come into play? Does ReadTheDocs provide 
virtual (apache) hosts? We can't just point wsgi.org to ReadTheDocs.org, 
right? Or should we just have a static page on wsgi.org that contains a 
link to ReadTheDocs?

Stephan

Am 10.09.2011 17:04, schrieb Graham Dumpleton:
> I'll see if I can find someone at the DjangoCon sprints who might be
> able to give suggestions of what to do. The sprints are at the offices
> of Eric from ReadTheDocs, so one would think I might be able to get an
> answer.
>
> On 10 September 2011 06:36, Masklinn<[email protected]>  wrote:
>> On 2011-09-10, at 11:45 , Stephan Diehl wrote:
>>>
>>> How far are we in getting things ready at the ReadTheDocs end? I'd say, the earlier we can switch the DNS entry, the better.
>> Everything was ported (as of August 28 anyway)[0], except for the specifications: from what I can tell, Sphinx does not support PEP-RST[1] (it does not understand the PEP header directives, so they are not displayed in the output), I did not get any answer when I asked about it on the pocoo IRC channel and google searches have failed to yield any information.
>>
>> Way forward I'd see would be adding a target to Sphinx's makefile to use Docutils directly to compile the PEPs, and linking to them as if they were static HTML documents, but I do not know if RTD supports that. You'd have to ask someone more knowledgeable (Graham has already ported the mod_wsgi docs so he might know). From RTD's documentation, it seems accounts can be whitelisted for code execution[2], Graham probably wouldn't have any issue getting flagged for a pair of bilding commands (and barring that, the compiled PEPs could always be committed to the repo).
>>
>> In the long run, having a pep sphinx extension might be nice.
>>
>> [0] https://github.com/GrahamDumpleton/wsgiorg
>> [1] https://github.com/GrahamDumpleton/wsgiorg/issues/11
>> [2] http://read-the-docs.readthedocs.org/en/latest/faq.html

_______________________________________________
Web-SIG mailing list
[email protected]
Web SIG: http://www.python.org/sigs/web-sig
Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/web-sig/gcpw-web-sig%40m.gmane.org