Re: WSGI for HTTP/2.0 ?

On Sat, Sep 20, 2014 at 9:23 AM, Robert Collins
<[email protected]> wrote:
> Well, thats certainly a challenge :). Whats the governance model here?
> Is a PEP appropriate, and if so - that gives us a BFDL or BFDL
> PEP-delegate to decide between bikeshed issues; and if its not a
> bikeshed issue then resolving it is actually necessary.

Yes, I think a good way forward would be to have a small cabal write a
PEP and then announce it here for further feedback and then
pronouncement by a BDFL or -delegate. If you want to be lead/editor,
that sounds great. It also seems like you should definitely involve
Graham and give credence to his thoughts.

I'd be excited about this and happy to give feedback a little later
once you've got some initial draft, as someone who likes to implement
his applications directly on top of WSGI for now (but I've also
implemented a couple of WebSocket servers).

Cheers,

Dirkjan
_______________________________________________
Web-SIG mailing list
[email protected]
Web SIG: http://www.python.org/sigs/web-sig
Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/web-sig/gcpw-web-sig%40m.gmane.org