Re: WSGI and asyncio (tulip)?
Sylvain Hellegouarch <[email protected]> Tue, 14 Oct 2014 21:01:27 +0200
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.python.web |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CALkdAkitD5yvwRNi-ws84vW-taRw+rS1Zf5pUcYPtEHDsuAO-Q@mail.gmail.com> |
2014-10-14 20:57 GMT+02:00 Justin Holmes <[email protected]>: > To me, asyncio already provides a de-facto standard API for > asynchronous backends and Tornado/Twisted provide a high level API on > top of it. I have to say, I don't precisely grasp what WSGI actually > wishes to bring to the table. > > I guess if we're really talking about this, the lowest common > denominator is a set of cognizable abstractions for HttpRequest and > HttpResponse, right? > > That's my feeling as well. But, considering the sheer amount of content produced in other threads, I guess I'm missing the point somehow ;) -- - Sylvain http://www.defuze.org http://twitter.com/lawouach _______________________________________________ Web-SIG mailing list [email protected] Web SIG: http://www.python.org/sigs/web-sig Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/web-sig/gcpw-web-sig%40m.gmane.org