Re: Removal of "Overwrite existing sources"

> If the feature is really in use, I wouldn't remove it.
> What's the reason not to use derived classes? That would allow a better
> separation between automatically generated code and your individual code.
>

I use the feature, simply because it is there and I didn't see any reason
not to use it.

If you'll remove this feature, I could easily update my code to use derived
classes. But I think that many other users (who do not read this
mailing-list) will be surprised to see their custom code getting erased.

It is up to you to decide how important it is to keep backward
compatibility. You could start by depreciating this feature and prompt
users of this feature that it would be removed in the future. Maybe you
could also make the unicode string changes you want and warn users that
they could have problems with it. (My code only uses ASCII, so I don't
think it will effect me.)

Udi

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Comprehensive Server Monitoring with Site24x7.
Monitor 10 servers for $9/Month.
Get alerted through email, SMS, voice calls or mobile push notifications.
Take corrective actions from your mobile device.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/Zoho

_______________________________________________
wxGlade-general mailing list
wxGlade-general-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wxglade-general